Evaluation:
Evaluator's Name: Ulan Aimagambetov
|
|||
Title of Website: OOLA LOMPATRAVELS
|
|||
Address or URL:
http://caremel289.wix.com/oola-lompa-travels
|
|||
1 = not so good
|
2 = okay
|
3 = good
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Credibility
|
|||
The author can be
contacted.
|
X
|
||
The content is good
for learning the language
|
X
|
||
Accuracy
|
|||
The content is
checked for errors
|
X
|
||
The information is
up-to-date.
|
X
|
||
The information is
complete.
|
X
|
||
Reasonableness
|
|||
The content is very
interesting
|
X
|
||
Keeps the visitor
engaged
|
X
|
||
Another resource
can be found with similar information.
|
X
|
||
List the second
resource.
|
|||
Design &
Technology
|
|||
The pictures are
relevant and clear.
|
X
|
||
The pages are easy
to move around.
|
X
|
||
The colors are
appealing.
|
X
|
||
All of the links
work.
|
X
|
||
Interesting
features are used
|
X
|
||
Good use of
techniques
|
X
|
||
Videos and audio
used
|
X
|
||
The pages load
relatively quickly. (About 30 seconds.)
|
X
|
||
Overall - How does
the website rate?
|
X
|
List three advanced features that you liked in this website:
- I liked it when the objects appeared as you scrolled down the page
- I liked the use of colors
- I like the picture
Evaluator's Name: Gabor Edelmayer
|
|||
Title of Website: OOLA LOMPA
TRAVELS
|
|||
Address or URL:
http://caremel289.wix.com/oola-lompa-travels
|
|||
1 = not so good
|
2 = okay
|
3 = good
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Credibility
|
|||
The author can be
contacted.
|
X
|
||
The content is good
for learning the language
|
X
|
||
Accuracy
|
|||
The content is
checked for errors
|
X
|
||
The information is
up-to-date.
|
X
|
||
The information is
complete.
|
X
|
||
Reasonableness
|
|||
The content is very
interesting
|
X
|
||
Keeps the visitor
engaged
|
X
|
||
Another resource
can be found with similar information.
|
X
|
||
List the second
resource.
|
|||
Design &
Technology
|
|||
The pictures are
relevant and clear.
|
X
|
||
The pages are easy
to move around.
|
X
|
||
The colors are
appealing.
|
X
|
||
All of the links
work.
|
X
|
||
Interesting
features are used
|
X
|
||
Good use of
techniques
|
X
|
||
Videos and audio
used
|
X
|
||
The pages load
relatively quickly. (About 30 seconds.)
|
X
|
||
Overall - How does
the website rate?
|
X
|
List three advanced features that you liked in this website:
- I like the amount of information used and potrayed on the webite
- I liked the use of colors
- I like the way the map and contact us page works
Evaluator's Name: Krish Jatwani
|
|||
Title of Website: OOLA LOMPA
TRAVELS
|
|||
Address or URL:
http://caremel289.wix.com/oola-lompa-travels
|
|||
1 = not so good
|
2 = okay
|
3 = good
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Credibility
|
|||
The author can be
contacted.
|
X
|
||
The content is good
for learning the language
|
X
|
||
Accuracy
|
|||
The content is
checked for errors
|
X
|
||
The information is
up-to-date.
|
X
|
||
The information is
complete.
|
X
|
||
Reasonableness
|
|||
The content is very
interesting
|
X
|
||
Keeps the visitor
engaged
|
X
|
||
Another resource
can be found with similar information.
|
X
|
||
List the second
resource.
|
|||
Design &
Technology
|
|||
The pictures are
relevant and clear.
|
X
|
||
The pages are easy
to move around.
|
X
|
||
The colors are
appealing.
|
X
|
||
All of the links
work.
|
X
|
||
Interesting
features are used
|
X
|
||
Good use of
techniques
|
X
|
||
Videos and audio
used
|
X
|
||
The pages load
relatively quickly. (About 30 seconds.)
|
X
|
||
Overall - How does
the website rate?
|
X
|
List three advanced features that you liked in this website:
- I like the website overall and the way it is used
- I like the idea for the travels website
- The colors were used perfectly
Evaluator's Name: Mritunjay Marc Mukherjee
|
|||
Title of Website: OOLA LOMPA
TRAVELS
|
|||
Address or URL:
http://caremel289.wix.com/oola-lompa-travels
|
|||
1 = not so good
|
2 = okay
|
3 = good
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Credibility
|
|||
The author can be
contacted.
|
X
|
||
The content is good
for learning the language
|
X
|
||
Accuracy
|
|||
The content is
checked for errors
|
X
|
||
The information is
up-to-date.
|
X
|
||
The information is
complete.
|
X
|
||
Reasonableness
|
|||
The content is very
interesting
|
X
|
||
Keeps the visitor engaged
|
X
|
||
Another resource
can be found with similar information.
|
X
|
||
List the second
resource.
|
|||
Design &
Technology
|
|||
The pictures are
relevant and clear.
|
X
|
||
The pages are easy
to move around.
|
X
|
||
The colors are
appealing.
|
X
|
||
All of the links
work.
|
X
|
||
Interesting
features are used
|
X
|
||
Good use of
techniques
|
X
|
||
Videos and audio
used
|
X
|
||
The pages load
relatively quickly. (About 30 seconds.)
|
X
|
||
Overall - How does
the website rate?
|
X
|
List three advanced features that you liked in this website:
- I like the colors patterns
- I like the use of technology in the product
- The use of buttons.
Possible Improvements:
Although the website met many aspects of the design brief
and the testers liked it, there are several ways in which it could be improved.
There could be galleries used for previous jobs to show the full transportation
services done by the company while there could be a shop section that allows
users to buy tickets for fliers and see an approximate price on the
services provided. Furthermore there could be
more information regarding the previous jobs and
the different pages could load a little bit faster.
Impact of the solution on the client/target audience:
The website has a positive impact on all target audiences.
It has a positive impact on oola lompa travels as the company is able to have a
nice website that can be viewed by many people and customers
online.
Strengths and weaknesses of the product:
Strengths
|
Weaknesses
|
Visually
appealing
|
Lack of animations
|
Easy
to use
|
No galleries used
|
Access
to contact details
|
No specialized features eg: shop
|
Features
a location map
|
No much buttons
|
Many
pictures and video
|
No special features
|
Interactive
menu bar
|
No page with products for sale
|
Many
specialized sites
|
The product was able to meet most of the design
specifications and thus could be considered a success.
It features all the must have features while also having many of the
features that were considered a "should" or "could"
in the design brief. The product had exceeded my
personal expectations and if I was allocated a longer time
frame to work with, the website could have been able to feature all parts
of the design brief.